Friday, September 4, 2026
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions

Flock says its cameras make US safer – so why are they being sabotaged?

by LJ News Opinions
September 4, 2026
in Opinions
0
A Flock camera in Massachusetts
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


There have been recent incidents of privacy breaches that have caught national attention. Last week, a police officer in Kentucky was charged after using the Flock system to track his ex-girlfriend – who filed a protection order – over 2,000 times.

He was caught using Flock’s newly mandatory, AI-powered audit tool that flags suspicious use.

Others are concerned about Flock being a way for police to avoid warrants, which are usually required to search a person’s property or tap their phone. In 2025, a detective in Johnson County, Texas, searched over 80,000 images to locate a woman suspected of having an abortion. He did not have a warrant.

CCTV cameras, licence plate readers, and surveillance are not new. But the scale of Flock’s network and the integration of AI in modern surveillance tech is a recent development and it’s turned Flock into a household name. Americans who otherwise ignored the cameras in their cities have started to notice, and tune in to the capabilities of the technology around them.

With AI, unlike older licence-plate readers, law enforcement can search surveillance footage with a string of words like “Caucasian man, blue shirt” – not just a licence-plate image.

One thing Flock does not use is facial recognition. But that doesn’t mean police departments are avoiding that tech. Critics say it violates human rights, is susceptible to misidentifying innocent people, and can be biased against minorities.

The BBC has received documents revealing that Harris County Sheriff’s Office, which covers Houston, uses other facial recognition technology, Clearview AI. The tool includes a database of over 70 billion images, many of which were scraped from public internet sources including social media. The documents, including purchase orders and a License Agreement, show that the county’s Clearview AI contract currently runs through to March 2027.

Several European countries have issued the company with data protection fines, including a £7.5m penalty from the UK’s Information Commissioner.

Harris County Sheriff’s Office use of this facial recognition technology has not been reported before. The office did not respond to requests for comment.



Source link

LJ News Opinions

LJ News Opinions

Next Post

From cockroach milk to stepping on snakes, Ig Nobel awards celebrates science at its oddest

Recommended

VIDEO: Coast Guard rescues 11-year-old from California waters

1 year ago

Even the Los Angeles Public Library has a take on the Kendrick Lamar-Drake beef

2 years ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    LJ News Opinions

    Welcome to LJ News Opinions, where breaking news stories have captivated us for over 20 years.
    Join us in this journey of sharing points of view about the news – read, react, engage, and unleash your opinion!

    Category

    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • U.S.
    • World News

    Site links

    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact

    Legal Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Disclaimer
    • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
    • DMCA
    • About us
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    © 2024, All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • U.S.
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Opinions

    © 2024, All rights reserved.