Thursday, March 5, 2026
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions

Spencer Elden loses legal case over baby photo on album cover

by LJ News Opinions
October 2, 2025
in Opinions
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The man who was photographed as a baby on the cover of Nirvana’s classic album Nevermind has failed in his attempts to sue the band for distributing child pornography.

A four-month-old Spencer Elden was pictured swimming naked underwater on the 1991 LP’s famous cover.

He sued the rock band and photographer Kirk Weddle, but a judge has ruled that “neither the pose, focal point, setting, nor overall context suggest the album cover features sexually explicit conduct”.

A lawyer for Nirvana said: “We are delighted the court has ended this meritless case and freed our creative clients of the stigma of false allegations.”

Mr Elden originally filed a lawsuit in 2021, arguing that his identity and name were “forever tied to the commercial sexual exploitation he experienced as a minor which has been distributed and sold worldwide”.

US District Judge Fernando Olguin dismissed it in 2022 because Mr Elden submitted it after the 10-year limit for filing a civil case.

An appeals court overturned that decision, allowing Mr Elden to refile the case.

However, Judge Olguin has now ruled that, beyond the fact Mr Elden was naked, nothing came “close to bringing the image within the ambit of the child pornography statute”.

He likened the image to a family photo of a child bathing, and said it is “plainly insufficient to support a finding” of child pornography.

“Nudity must be coupled with other circumstances that make the visual depiction lascivious or sexually provocative,” Judge Olguin wrote, quoting from an earlier ruling.

The judge also cited factors including the presence of Mr Elden’s parents at the photo shoot, the fact the photographer was a friend, and the fact he had previously “embraced and financially benefitted from being featured on the album cover”.

Mr Elden’s legal team told Rolling Stone they “respectfully disagree” with the decision and plan to appeal.

“As long as the entertainment industry prioritizes profits over childhood privacy, consent, and dignity, we will continue our pursuit for awareness and accountability,” said James R Marsh of the Marsh Law Firm.



Source link

LJ News Opinions

LJ News Opinions

Next Post

Tropical disturbance fuels Florida wet weekend, flooding threat

Recommended

Israel’s prime minister sends Mossad director to Gaza ceasefire talks

1 year ago

Iran's central bank chief resigns amid protests and currency turmoil

2 months ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    LJ News Opinions

    Welcome to LJ News Opinions, where breaking news stories have captivated us for over 20 years.
    Join us in this journey of sharing points of view about the news – read, react, engage, and unleash your opinion!

    Category

    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • U.S.
    • World News

    Site links

    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact

    Legal Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Disclaimer
    • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
    • DMCA
    • About us
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    © 2024, All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • U.S.
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Opinions

    © 2024, All rights reserved.