Friday, March 6, 2026
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology

Not AGAIN! NASA’s Artemis II moon mission is delayed for a second time after several last-minute issues are spotted on the SLS rocket – as furious fans call for SpaceX to step in

by LJ News Opinions
March 1, 2026
in Technology
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


NASA‘s Artemis II moon mission has been delayed for a second time after several last–minute issues were spotted on the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.

After successfully completing the second wet dress rehearsal last Thursday, hopes had been high that the historic moon mission would launch in March.

However, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman now says the March launch window is ‘out of consideration’.

That means Artemis II will not take its crew – Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen – around the moon until April 1 at the very earliest.

Mr Isaacman says that the reason for the delay is an ‘interruption in helium flow in the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage’.

The system worked during both wet dress rehearsals, but engineers were unable to get helium flow through the vehicle during routine maintenance on Saturday night.

Now, as the long–awaited moon mission is pushed back once again, some frustrated fans have called for Elon Musk’s SpaceX to step in with assistance.

Taking to X, one fan vented: ‘Time to scrap the 1960s tech and innovate to build next gen space launch vehicles and to stay on par with SpaceX.’ 

NASA’s Artemis II moon mission has been delayed for the second time, as last–minute technical issues are found in the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket 

NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said that the issue had been caused by an 'interruption in helium flow in the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage'

NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said that the issue had been caused by an ‘interruption in helium flow in the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage’

Fed–up space enthusiasts have taken to social media to vent their irritation over the persistent delays.

One commenter wrote: ‘At this rate, the Chinese will soundly beat us to the Moon.’

Others explicitly suggested that SpaceX should be called on to lend assistance or even replace the SLS rocket altogether.

On X, which is owned by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, one commenter wrote: ‘@SpaceX Those guys need a ride to the moon, please help them.’

Another asked: ‘When will NASA stop the financial haemorrhaging and turn this program over to SpaceX?’

‘Can we get out of this contract and save money with SpaceX,’ suggested another.

In particular, a number of space fans suggested that the experimental Starship rocket could make a viable replacement.

Mr Isaacman (left) says that the setback will 'almost assuredly' affect the intended March launch date, ruling out the Artemis II launch until April

Mr Isaacman (left) says that the setback will ‘almost assuredly’ affect the intended March launch date, ruling out the Artemis II launch until April 

Mr Isaacman says the systems performed well during both wet dress rehearsals, but unexpectedly failed during a 'routine operation'

Mr Isaacman says the systems performed well during both wet dress rehearsals, but unexpectedly failed during a ‘routine operation’  

On X, frustrated space fans have called for Elon Musk's SpaceX to provide assistance to the Artemis II programme

On X, frustrated space fans have called for Elon Musk’s SpaceX to provide assistance to the Artemis II programme

Why does NASA use hydrogen fuel?

The SLS rocket uses a mixture of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.

Since hydrogen is such a small molecule, it is extremely prone to leaking.

However, hydrogen is also cheap, naturally abundant, and produces a phenomenal amount of energy.

According to NASA, this mix gives the ‘highest specific impulse, or efficiency in relation to the amount of propellant consumed, of any known rocket propellant’.

Another important factor is that the SLS rocket inherits a lot of its hardware and systems from the Shuttle era rockets.

These engines were built to run on hydrogen, so NASA can’t change fuels without an expensive redesign of the entire rocket and engine system.  

‘I beginning to think that the SpaceX Starship will be launching astronauts to space before the Artemis program,’ one commenter suggested.

While one added: ‘Time to replace SLS with Falcon Heavy. Might even actually do it faster with Starship.’

For context, SpaceX has been contracted by NASA to provide a modified version of Starship for the lunar landing during the Artemis III mission.

In April 2021, NASA awarded Elon Musk’s company a $2.9 billion contract to provide the first crewed lunar lander, but SpaceX is widely expected to miss the 2027 target date.

Last year, acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy threatened to open up the contract to other countries due to persistent delays, saying at the time: ‘The problem is, they’re behind.’

However, NASA’s immediate problems are the ongoing delays afflicting the problem–plagued SLS rocket.

Mr Isaacman says that the source of the problem could be located in one of the filers or quick–disconnect ‘umbilicals’ that pass gases between the ground and the rocket.

Alternatively, he says that the issue could have been caused by a ‘failed check valve onboard the vehicle, which would be consistent with Artemis I’

Angry commenters lamented the costs of the SLS rocket and its persistent delays, arguing that the mission should be turned over to SpaceX

Angry commenters lamented the costs of the SLS rocket and its persistent delays, arguing that the mission should be turned over to SpaceX

One commenter asked why America could 'get out of this contract' in order to save money with SpaceX

One commenter asked why America could ‘get out of this contract’ in order to save money with SpaceX

The SLS rocket will now need to roll back to the Vehicle Assembly Building at the Kennedy Launch Centre for repairs, meaning that another wet dress rehearsal is almost certain

The SLS rocket will now need to roll back to the Vehicle Assembly Building at the Kennedy Launch Centre for repairs, meaning that another wet dress rehearsal is almost certain 

After problems with the helium system were discovered overnight, NASA has now made the disappointing decision to roll SLS back to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) at Kennedy Space Centre.

While the agency has a limited capacity to fix issues at the launch tower, more serious problems need to be addressed in the VAB, which gives engineers better access to the vehicle.

The vibrations caused by rolling the rocket in or out of the VAB risk loosening or disturbing seals and valves, meaning that one or two more wet dress rehearsals are almost certain.

After the success of the second wet dress rehearsal, the Artemis II crew entered quarantine in Houston, Texas, on Friday night.

During quarantine, the crew limit their exposure to other people so that they can stay in good health for the flight.

This procedure usually starts 14 days out from the launch date, but NASA has not said whether the crew will be able to leave quarantine before the April launch date.

Writing on X, Mr Isaacman added: ‘I understand people are disappointed by this development. That disappointment is felt most by the team at NASA, who have been working tirelessly to prepare for this great endeavor.’

Artemis II: Key facts

Launch date: NASA initially identified three possible launch windows for Artemis II: From February 6 to February 11, from March 6 to March 11, and from April 1 to April 6. The space agency is now targeting the April window. 

Mission objective: To complete a lunar flyby, passing the ‘dark side’ of the moon and test systems for a future lunar landing.

Total distance to travel: 620,000 miles (one million km)

Mission duration: 10 days 

Estimated total cost: $44 billion (£32.5 billion)

  • NASA Space Launch System rocket: $23.8 billion (£17.6 billion)
  • Orion deep–space spacecraft: $20.4 billion (£15 billion)

Crew: 

  • Commander Reid Wiseman
  • Pilot Victor Glover
  • Mission Specialist Christina Koch
  • Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen

Mission Stages:

  1. Launch from Kennedy Space Centre Launch Pad 39B
  2. Manoeuvre in orbit to raise the perigee using the Cryogenic Propulsion Stage
  3. Burn to raise apogee using the Cryogenic Propulsion Stage
  4. Detach from Cryogenic Propulsion Stage and perform translunar injection
  5. Fly to the moon over four days
  6. Complete lunar flyby at a maximum altitude of 5,523 miles (8,889 km) above the moon’s surface
  7. Return to Earth over four days.
  8. Separate the crew module from the European Service Module and the crew module adapter
  9. Splashdown in the Pacific Ocean  

Source link

Tags: dailymailElon MuskNASAsciencetechSpaceX
LJ News Opinions

LJ News Opinions

Next Post

Auston Matthews gets standing ovation from Toronto fans after gold medal win

Recommended

New protests in Tanzania's main city after chaotic election

Africa’s latest elections end with crackdowns on opposition and disputed results

4 months ago

Trump administration exits 66 global organizations

2 months ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    LJ News Opinions

    Welcome to LJ News Opinions, where breaking news stories have captivated us for over 20 years.
    Join us in this journey of sharing points of view about the news – read, react, engage, and unleash your opinion!

    Category

    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • U.S.
    • World News

    Site links

    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact

    Legal Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Disclaimer
    • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
    • DMCA
    • About us
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    © 2024, All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • U.S.
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Opinions

    © 2024, All rights reserved.