In Jim Ratcliffe’s telling, he’s the one doing the favor. A favor to the people of Manchester, to the British government and to the country more broadly.
The billionaire co-owner of Manchester United on Tuesday pitched a new soccer stadium as crucial to the success of plans by Britain’s Labour Party to regenerate a large swath of the city the team calls home.
Mr. Ratcliffe, Britain’s richest man, said a project to build a 100,000-seat venue next to Old Trafford, the club’s storied current home, would lure visitors to Manchester the way the Eiffel Tower brings throngs of tourists to Paris. He has pledged that the stadium itself would be solely funded by the club; in contrast to the United States, public money is rarely used for private stadiums in Britain.
But there was a significant catch: It would happen only as part of a broader project that would require billions of pounds in funding from the British government, which is straining to bring down debt and avoid further spending cuts or higher taxes.
Glossy renderings showed an arena with three towering spires, reminiscent of the modern stadiums being built in the Persian Gulf. But several questions about the project to reimagine the home of one of the best-known franchises in all of sports, and regenerate a worn-down part of northern England, remained after the presentation at an architecture firm’s riverside office in London.
A leaky roof in one of Britain’s wettest cities is a regular testament to Manchester United’s desire for a new stadium. But how such a massive project, which the club said would cost 2 billion pounds ($2.6 billion), will be funded and completed within the five-year time frame set by Mr. Ratcliffe was not answered.
A day earlier, Mr. Ratcliffe, who in 2023 spent $1.5 billion for a 25 percent stake and day-to-day control over United, was blaming the club’s finances for a raft of unpopular cost-cutting initiatives and ticket price increases. The day before that, thousands of fans marched in protest of the club’s ownership ahead of the underachieving team’s latest league game.
But in London on Tuesday, Mr. Ratcliffe presented an image of a gleaming venue at the center of a new entertainment district for Manchester, packed with selfie-taking tourists from around the world. The “most iconic and best stadium in the world,” as he put it, seemed distant from United’s current reality.
Although it is the most successful club in English soccer, the team — currently stuck in the bottom half of the standings — won its last title more than a decade ago.
Mr. Ratcliffe, a 72-year-old businessman from Manchester who made his fortune in petrochemicals, kept returning to the same theme: Without United’s new arena at its core, any revitalization plan for the city would be doomed.
But without a commitment by the government of billions for a broader revamp of the area’s housing, transport and infrastructure, the stadium will not happen.
“The new stadium in isolation doesn’t make sense without the wider regeneration project,” said Omar Berrada, Manchester United’s chief executive, who was one of several club executives to travel to London for the presentation.
The Manchester regeneration plan is one of three major projects — including an expansion of London’s Heathrow Airport and a technology-focused cluster between Oxford and Cambridge — that the Labour government has backed since taking office. But Rachel Reeves, Britain’s finance minister, has not provided more details since expressing support in January.
Should the models and drawings become reality, it would represent a rare positive for a team in a cycle of decline that would once have seemed unthinkable.
United’s debts, including hundreds of millions of pounds owed to rival teams for underperforming stars, some of whom Mr. Ratcliffe recently described as “overpaid,” are now more than £1 billion. Much of that is linked to the leveraged buyout by the Florida-based Glazer family, which took majority control of United in 2005.
The club has recently made deep cuts, with Mr. Ratcliffe determined to reduce what he has described as a “bloated” administration by as many as 400 staff members. For years, costs had grown faster than revenue, he said, and without the measures to reduce spending the team would have run out of cash this year. On the field, Ruben Amorim, who took over midseason as coach, has described the team as perhaps the worst in the club’s history.
Getting the club’s finances in order would help management get investors and banks on board with “the journey to build an iconic stadium,” Mr. Berrada said. The club’s shares, which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, have fallen nearly 20 percent this year. But on Tuesday they reversed course, rising more than 1.7 percent.
