Friday, March 6, 2026
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
  • Home
  • U.S.
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Opinions
No Result
View All Result
LJ News Opinions
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions

Los Angeles could remove parking requirement for new housing

by LJ News Opinions
June 12, 2025
in Opinions
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Los Angeles City Council members have proposed eliminating the parking requirement for new housing developments, a move that is intended to make building new housing cheaper but could further strain street parking.

Councilmembers Bob Blumenfield and Nithya Raman introduced a motion to have city staff “report back to the council about a potential citywide elimination of parking requirements in new developments,” LAist reports.

Such requirements have already been eliminated near transit lines by a state law, but expanding the program citywide could reduce the cost of construction, thereby allowing more housing to be built and for rents to go down.

Parking in Los Angeles, however, is already a hot-button issue for many. Neighborhoods like Koreatown are already known as parking nightmares, and some fear that residents of these new parking-free developments will further strain street parking.

But despite those worries, studies say providing car parking could cost residents thousands of dollars per year, LAist reports.

“A 2020 study from UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation found that building a parking structure for a new affordable housing project raises construction costs by as much as $38,000 per apartment,” the outlet explained. “Another study found that bundling parking with each unit increases rents for L.A. tenants by about $200 per month.”

Azeen Khanmalek, executive director of affordable housing nonprofit Abundant Housing L.A., put the issue more simply when speaking with LAist.

“We have a critical choice to make,” he said. “Are we going to prioritize housing for cars? Or are we going to prioritize housing for people?”



Source link

LJ News Opinions

LJ News Opinions

Next Post

Real reason Taylor Swift deleted pictures of Blake Lively as fans call out missing posts

Recommended

A 10-point plan for Israel | Israel-Palestine conflict

5 months ago

Massive ‘real life Garfield’ fat cat named Bug dubbed ‘world’s chonkiest cat’ after being rescued from overfeeding

5 months ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    LJ News Opinions

    Welcome to LJ News Opinions, where breaking news stories have captivated us for over 20 years.
    Join us in this journey of sharing points of view about the news – read, react, engage, and unleash your opinion!

    Category

    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • U.S.
    • World News

    Site links

    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact

    Legal Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Disclaimer
    • California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
    • DMCA
    • About us
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    © 2024, All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • U.S.
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Opinions

    © 2024, All rights reserved.